Agents and How to Get Them
In the interests of full disclosure, I have to say I don’t have an agent myself yet, so I’m really only qualified to give general advice like don’t market your work before it’s ready and never pay an agent to look at it. But here’s what I know about how to get agents. Some of this is just common sense. Some is stuff I’ve picked up over the depressingly long number of years I’ve been writing. Some I made up out of thin air… Well, okay, no, I didn’t, I promise.
Getting an agent basically boils down to you giving them something they think they can sell. It’s a lot like working with a recruiting agency, except that agents don’t go trolling for writers on Monster and call them with prospective jobs. But basically Writer A submits his resume (=query letter) to Agent B, who knows what all her publisher/prodco/studio/etc. contacts want and uses that knowledge to accept or reject Writer A as a client. However, if Writer A has demonstrated an alarming lack of anything resembling writing ability, then he’s pretty much out of luck unless he’s a screenwriter with a hugely high-concept premise who can be booted off the project so someone who actually knows how to write can be brought on board to do a page one rewrite keeping only the premise. In short, get some qualified people to tell you your writing is decent before you bother with agents. Don’t blow it by trying too early. The agents aren’t going anywhere.
Always be professional. Never tell off a prospective agent no matter how much you want to. After all, you never know when you might want to work with them later on. And keep in mind that just because you get an agent doesn’t mean they’ll be able to sell your work. In some cases if they can’t sell your stuff pretty fast, they may lose interest in you.
Do a lot of research before querying agents. If you’re writing books, Writer’s Market has agent listings (you have to pay to use the site, but I assume they still publish their annual door-stopper which can be found in libraries or browsed in the coffee shop kindly provided by your neighborhood Borders or B&N… er, I mean, you can buy it at one of those stores). The Association of Authors’ Representatives has a searchable database and also requires its members to adhere to a canon of ethics, which is always nice (although maybe not if you’re an “agent” looking to scam people). Check the acknowledgments in books you like in your genre to see if your fave writers have thanked their agents, whom you might then query. Read blogs by agents like Nathan Bransford and Kristin Nelson. A friend has recommended Agent Query Connect, but since I’m not a member I can’t comment on how good that site is (well, I could, but my comments would be worthless). If you’re writing a novel, finish it before querying agents. For non-fiction you can query with a proposal and sample chapters.
If you’re a screenwriter, keep in mind there are the Big Five agencies (CAA, ICM, Endeavor, UTA, and William Morris) and then there are smaller agencies. Lots of contact info for folks in the entertainment industry can be found in the Hollywood Creative Directory (another pay site; not sure if the print version is still around). For a new writer, a lesser-known but hungrier agent may be a better bet than someone established who already has big-name clients and may forget you exist, especially if they can’t sell your stuff or get you work right off the bat. In the world of screenwriting, it’s also a good idea to have more than one completed script and several pitches ready for when they want to know what else you’ve got. Keep in mind a script isn’t completed just because you typed FADE OUT. Most scripts require several drafts before they’re market-ready (so do most novels, for that matter).
Probably the best way to get an agent is through a referral from another writer. But unless this writer is your BFF, don’t insult them by asking them to pass along anything sub-par. In fact, no matter who they are, don’t ask them. If they’re willing to read your work and they really think it’s great, they’ll offer to pass it on to their agent. If they think it sucks or would never sell or isn’t what their agent is looking for, they won’t. It’s that simple.
The best way to avoid being scammed is to know what’s going on and who’s who in your chosen sector of the professional writing world. Follow the publishing news. Read the trades. Read blogs. Read message boards (Done Deal is a good one for screenwriters, for all writers there’s Absolute Write, and at both sites you’ll find a mix of pros and raw newbs; for schmucks with Underwoods, there’s a site here where you’ll find fewer established pros but some good knowledgeable people and more cussing). Also, a lot of professional writers and screenwriters have blogs and/or websites. The Artful Writer (Craig Mazin’s blog) has a forum where a number of pros post (no guarantees as to the quality of what they post, but they post). Chatrooms such as the one at AbWrite or the one at Artful can be good places to schmooze with fellow writers.
That’s about it. If anyone wants to comment with more details or things I left out or personal stories about agents, you know where the comments section is.
![]()
on April 28, 2008 on 12:24 pm
Thanks for a very thoughtful post Raven. I used to be an attorney, so I know how hard it is when the average Joe Schmo goes looking for an attorney to represent him. I think I will just take my time (maybe when I get this second script done, which btw, is turning out a lot harder to write than the first one!).
on April 28, 2008 on 1:30 pm
I tried. I woke up this morning and realized I didn’t even mention managers, and I didn’t go into stuff like hip-pockets for screenwriters, where an agent doesn’t quite take you on but sort of does.
on April 28, 2008 on 4:26 pm
Whew! I haven’t missed too many posts! Excellent, excellent, excellent as usual.
Re your post about beautiful/ugly people. Quite frankly, I am getting tired of always looking at emaciated (men included) people who have uber-chiseled faces. You know, I’ve been sitting around watching too many Bravo reality shows and it’s so nice to see someone with cute fat cheeks every now and then. I also appreciate the different body types that you see. Hollywood has a standard of beauty that is just so boring.
on April 28, 2008 on 7:20 pm
You haven’t missed many because I’ve been really bad about updating. For what it’s worth, I feel quite guilty about it!
I recently saw an ad (I think it was in KoreAm) for plastic surgery to chisel the chin. They showed before and after pictures, and I really thought the before picture looked better. The person’s face had a little plumpness to it and looked more natural.
on April 28, 2008 on 7:40 pm
You brought up a specific question I had actually. About managers. It seems they take a higher cut of your income–15% as opposed to the standard 10. But from what I understand, they are not agents, and cannot, by law, sell a script. The manager would then have to find an agent who could sell your script. Does this mean the agent now gets another 10%? Does the writer who goes through a manager forfeit 25% of earnings?
on April 28, 2008 on 8:04 pm
Managers are not agents, no. As a general rule an agent is more concerned with selling your finished product or getting you writing work, whereas a manager is more concerned with nurturing your career. And yes, if you have both, they each get their cut. Some folks add an entertainment attorney into the mix as well, so that’s more money that comes out of their earnings. Not all writers have both an agent and a manager, though. As for who’s legally allowed to sell what, I don’t know, and I don’t want to give false information. That would be a question for the good folks at one of the message boards I mentioned. All I can tell you is what I’ve picked up from people who are repped or are actively trying to acquire screenwriting representation, which I’m not.
on April 28, 2008 on 9:44 pm
I think we’d all be better served by worrying 99 percent on our craft and 1 percent on finding representation.
But I’d say that it’s easier to say what I just said when I’m repped than when I’m not. When I wasn’t repped, I worried all the time about finding a rep.
on April 29, 2008 on 12:37 am
I have to say I’m not worrying too much about finding a rep right now. When the new revised stand-alone version of Book One of my trilogy of novels is done, then I’ll worry about it. Until then, I have too much writing to do.
on April 29, 2008 on 8:02 am
Nice article with lots of great points. I just signed up for a trial membership with Backspace (http://www.bksp.org), where a lot of published writers hang out along with some editors and agents. I’m still too new to be able to render any judgement on it at this point.
on April 29, 2008 on 11:43 am
Hmm, Backspace is new to me. I just took a look and found some interesting articles, but is Richard Curtis seriously advocating using Word’s grammar check function? Like, seriously? Spell check all right, but the grammar check is usually way off. I don’t even turn it on. Oh, and is he the same Richard Curtis who wrote Love, Actually? I’m thinking not. (link: http://www.ereads.com/richard_curtis/labels/Richard%20Curtis.html)
on April 29, 2008 on 1:29 pm
Hello, Raven, Richard Curtis here. Richard Curtis the literary agent, that is. If you’re looking for the brilliant screenwriter, that’s the other Richard Curtis, the one with a mile long wikipedia entry.
And yes, I am seriously advocating grammar check, and if you sat where I sit — and where editors sit — and saw what passes for grammar in so many submissions, you switch your grammar check on, too. It may pass for grammar, but most of it doesn’t pass grammar check. The point I made in my article “Burn, Which, Burn” is that if an editor is distracted by all those green underlines, your submission will be at a disadvantage compared to one free of any flags, red or green.
Richard
on April 29, 2008 on 1:51 pm
Oops, Richard, you caught me! I hope you weren’t offended by my rather sharp comment. I know what you mean about terrible grammar, I see a lot of it myself in spec scripts I read, but my problem with Word’s grammar check is that it’s often wrong. Also, it will flag things that might be stylistically justified, such as fragments or long sentences, even if they work in context. Basically it’s a program trying to dictate how language should work, but language can’t be quantified in a computer program (witness the “translations” produced by sites like Babelfish). Someone who uses the language expertly could end up with green squiggles all over his or her manuscript, and yet the writing might still be excellent. That’s my argument against the grammar check.
I don’t know what the solution is for would-be writers with horrible grammar. Maybe Strunk & White? Or else more reading to help them absorb good grammar as used by professional writers.
on April 29, 2008 on 4:41 pm
Hello again, Raven. No offense whatever!
You’re absolutely right that grammar check is completely rote and soulless. But it offers writers the option to take its didactic advice or override it (by hitting “Ignore” or “Ignore Rule”). By going through your manuscript and deliberately accepting or rejecting grammar check’s suggestions, you not only maximize the rich options that the English language offers, you also scrub your manuscript of those distracting green squiggles. And, as I pointed out in my article, we never had that problem when we submitted printed manuscripts to editors. But now that we are submitting document files by email, we have to be aware of what they look like at the other end.
Richard
on April 29, 2008 on 8:38 pm
That completely makes sense. When I’m ready to submit I think I’ll turn grammar check back on and make sure it has nothing to say about my writing.
on April 30, 2008 on 1:59 am
For a long time, I kept my grammar checker off. But then I learned that I have certain “ticks” that my eye often does not see. So I turned it back on. It can be frustrating and distracting, because it sometimes flags sentences that appear to be perfectly valid.
I found what Richard said to be fascinating, because Microsoft Word has influenced the whole manuscript submission process! I’m sure this is a consequence that Microsoft never envisioned.
on April 30, 2008 on 1:54 pm
Yeah, I’m sure they didn’t! Even now they may not realize the impact their software may be having. But here’s something I don’t understand. If writers are subbing their work full of reddies and greenies, why don’t they notice the problems and fix them? I often wonder this when I get a script full of typos to read. I mean, spell check must have flagged them, right?
on April 30, 2008 on 4:15 pm
OK, call me stupid, but I never figured out how to get spell check to work on Final Draft. It would underline words that were spelled wrong, but would not alert me to something like:
I bound my wallet in the cushions of my sofa.
If anyone wants to tell me why I am so stupid, I am here to listen.
on April 30, 2008 on 4:24 pm
Spell check only flags words that are spelled wrong. “Bound” is spelled correctly. Sure, it doesn’t make sense, but spell check doesn’t know that. You have to catch that yourself when you proofread.